Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
The Superior Court of New York City, 1886

Adler v. Baltzer

Adler v. Baltzer
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided December 30, 1886
22 Jones & S. 514

Counsel

Wingate & Qullen, for appellant., Horwitz & Hershfield, for respondents.

Adler v. Baltzer

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The pleadings show that the answer admitted that an order had been made discharging an *515attachment. There was, therefore, no issue on this point to be tried. It may be said, however, that no testimony was given that tended to show that the admission was not correct. There was no defense, if such an order had been made.

Wingate & Qullen, for appellant. Horwitz & Hershfield, for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.