The Superior Court of New York City, 1887

Moore v. Williams

The Superior Court of New York City · Decided June 23, 1887

23 Jones & S. 116

Counsel

Stephen G. Williams, attorney, and G. Zabriskie, of counsel for appellant, on the questions considered in the-opinion, argued:, Davis, Cohen & Mc William, attorneys, and Maurice S. Cohen, of counsel for respondent, on the questions considered in the opinion, argued:

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The opinion rendered by the. learned judge below, on denying the motion of the defendants for a new trial, is substantially correct. The assignment to Brown, and the release by Brown to the defendants, cannot vary the result when all the attending and surrounding circumstances are considered. The insufficiency in the proof of the judgment recovered by Barnes, has been cured by the production of a certified copy of the judgment roll.

The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.