Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
The Superior Court of New York City, 1889

Palmer v. Safft

Palmer v. Safft
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided January 7, 1889 · Ingraham, Writing
24 Jones & S. 594

Counsel

McKoon & Foote, attorneys, and D. D. McKoon of counsel for plaintiff., Eugene K. Sackett, attorney, and Lemuel Skidmore, of counsel for defendant.

Palmer v. Safft

Opinion of the Court

The Court (Ingraham, J., writing)

held “ as set forth in the head note, citing Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 365-372; Page v. Waring, 103 AT". Y. 636; and held that there was sufficient evidence of the facts constituting *595adverse possession to carry the case to the jury; and therefore sustained defendant’s exceptions and ordered a new trial.”

Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Freedman, J. concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.