The Superior Court of New York City, 1889

Videtto v. Dudley

Videtto v. Dudley
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided March 5, 1889 · Sedgwick, Truax, Writing
24 Jones & S. 600

Counsel

David Keane, attorney and of counsel for appellant., Friend & House, attorneys and of counsel for respondent.

Videtto v. Dudley

Concurring Opinion

The Court (Truax, J., writing and Sedgwick, Ch. J., concurring)

held that it was not necessary to allege in the moving papers that there were no other witnesses by whom he could establish the facts sought to be proved by the party; that the Code did not require such an allegation; "that the moving party has a right if he sees fit to call his adversary to prove his case; ” also held “ that an allegation that the action is brought *601to recover damages for a personal injury resulting from defendant’s negligence was a sufficient statement of the nature of the action.” The order was reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.