The Superior Court of New York City, 1889

Atkinson v. Truesdell

Atkinson v. Truesdell
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided November 21, 1889 · Held, Ingraham, Truax, Writing
57 Jones & S. 600

Counsel

Edward P. Wilder, for appellant., Samuel W. Weiss, for respondents.

Atkinson v. Truesdell

Opinion of the Court

The Court held'(Ingraham, J., writing, Truax, J., concurring),

that as the records before the general term showed that the motion was made on a case, and was argued and decided on the merits, the objection that under § 1002 it could not have been made on a case, inasmuch as it was not made at the term at which the case was tried, or before the time in which the defendant could take an appeal from the judgment had expired, was untenable. The case of Forstman v. Schutling, 38 Hun, 485, distinguished.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.