The Superior Court of New York City, 1890

Lange v. Lewi

Lange v. Lewi
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided June 27, 1890 · Cueiam
26 Jones & S. 265; 32 N.Y. St. Rep. 418

Counsel

Carter, Hughes & Cravath, attorneys, and Frederick R. Kellogg of counsel, for appellant, among other things, argued:, Hays & Greenbaum, attorneys for the sheriff; J. G. Flammer, attorney for respondent, and John L. Hill of counsel, on the questions' considered in the opinion, argued:—

Lange v. Lewi

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to compel delivery by sheriff to plaintiff of property which the sheriff on plaintiff’s requisition had taken in replevin. It appears that the defendant is a warehouseman; that he received the goods in question from one Alexander Agar on storage and issued his receipt therefor, and that he prevented a delivery to the plaintiff by delivering to the sheriff the notice, affidavit and undertaking required by § 1704 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The affidavit was sufficient for the reasons stated by the learned judge below, and we can see no merit in any of the points raised by the appellant.

The order should be affirmed with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.