The Superior Court of New York City, 1891

Griggs v. Day

Griggs v. Day
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided January 5, 1891
27 Jones & S. 560; 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 78

Counsel

John McDonald, for appellant., William R. Bronk, for respondent.

Griggs v. Day

Opinion of the Court

The Court (Freedman, J., writing) held, after a further hearing of counsel on the settlement of the order, that in view of the complicated state of the accounts between the parties, the defendant should have a further hearing upon a new trial, and that the order to be entered should provide for the unconditional reversal of the judgment upon the facts .as well as the law, and for a new trial, in accordance with the principles laid down in the opinion reported in 58 N. Y. Superior Court Reports, 385.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.