Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
The Superior Court of New York City, 1891

Bohlen v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.

Bohlen v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided May 4, 1891
27 Jones & S. 565; 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 565

Counsel

Davies & Rapallo, attorneys, and Julien T. Davies and J. C. Thomas of counsel, for appellants., Sackett & Bennett, attorneys, and Charles Gibson Bennett of counsel, for respondent.

Bohlen v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

*566The Court (McAdam, J., writing) held as stated in the head-note, on the ground (as to the third proposition) among others, that the case came within the rule that on a trial by the court without a jury improper testimony may upon reflection be disregarded or stricken out without producing any effect or causing any injury whatever.

Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Freedman, J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.