The Superior Court of New York City, 1891

Avert v. Jacob

Avert v. Jacob
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided May 4, 1891 · Freedman
38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1026

Counsel

E. Luther Hamilton (Austen G. Fox, of counsel), for app’lts; E. H. Benn, for resp’t.

Avert v. Jacob

Opinion of the Court

Freedman, J.

The questions presented by the appeal bring the facts which are complicated. There is no controversy as to the law applicable to the case. The facts, and all questions arising thereon, have been fully discussed by the referee in an elaborate opinion, and a careful examination of the whole case has failed to disclose any error committed by him.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of the referee.

Sedgwick, Oh. J., and McAdam, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.