The Superior Court of New York City, 1892

Morpie v. Manhattan Brass Co.

Morpie v. Manhattan Brass Co.
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided March 14, 1892
28 Jones & S. 423; 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 834

Counsel

Brownell & Lathrop, attorneys, and William G. Lathrop, Jr., of counsel, for appellant, argued:, Adam Finch, for respondent.

Morpie v. Manhattan Brass Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s right to security for costs depended upon section 3268 Code Civ. Pro., as amended by chapter 170, Laws of 1891. It says that a defendant may require security for costs to be given where the plaintiff is, when the action was commenced, subd. 5, an infant whose guardian ad litem, had not given such security excepting as otherwise provided in *425§§ 459 and 469 of the act. These sections refer to the right of an infant to obtain leave to prosecute as a poor person.

As in this case it did not appear that the guardian ad litem had filed security for costs, or that the plaintiff had obtained leave to sue as a poor person, the defendant’s motion should have been granted. The order appealed from is reversed and defendant’s motion below granted, with $10 costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.