Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
The Superior Court of New York City, 1892

Burrows v. Atlas Steamship Co.

Burrows v. Atlas Steamship Co.
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided May 2, 1892
29 Jones & S. 206; 46 N.Y. St. Rep. 533; 61 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 206

Counsel

Frederick Ingraham, attorney, and James W. Treadwell of counsel, for appellant., Cary & Whitridge, attorneys, and Edwin T. Rice, Jr. of counsel, for respondent.

Burrows v. Atlas Steamship Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

There were no errors of law made during the course of the trial. At the end of the testi*207mony each side asked that a verdict he directed in its favor. This gave to the judge the office of the jury. The evidence was not conclusively in favor of the plaintiff, and the finding of the judge for the defendant was final.

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.