Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
The Superior Court of New York City, 1892

Genet v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.

Genet v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided July 5, 1892
29 Jones & S. 332; 47 N.Y. St. Rep. 291

Counsel

George C. Genet, attorney and of counsel, for appellant, argued:—, Matthews & Smith, attorneys, and Frank E. Smith of counsel, for respondent, argued:—

Genet v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The court at special term had power to order restitution (Wright v. Nostrand, 100 N. Y., 616; Carleton v. The Mayor, 19 Weekly Digest, 354), and as the method adopted to enforce it carried out the necessary effect of the judgment of the Court of Appeals and rendered it effectual, there is no necessity for condemning it by a reversal.

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.