Frank v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.
Frank v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.
44 N.Y. St. Rep. 830
Opinion of the Court
That there should be affirmance in these cases follows from Jordan v. The Metropolitan Railway Co., decided at this term.
No errors requiring reversal appear in the admission of the evidence objected to in the Lubin and the Ludovici cases.
Judgments affirmed, with costs.
Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Gtldebsleeve, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.