The Superior Court of New York City, 1892

Jones v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.

Jones v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided May 2, 1892
46 N.Y. St. Rep. 966

Counsel

Davies & Rapallo, for app’lts: Sackett & Bennett, for resp’ts.

Jones v. Metropolitan El. R. Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment should De modified by requiring the plaintiffs, at the time of the delivery of their deed as in said judgment, provided, to also deliver to the defendants a release of the property duly executed by the mortgagee of the promises mentioned in the thirty-ninth finding of fact, and as thus modified it should he affirmed, without costs to ei her party on this appeal.

Sedgwick, Ch. J.. Freedman and McAdam, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.