The Superior Court of New York City, 1893

Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co.

Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co.
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided January 15, 1893 · Dttgeo
2 Misc. 572

Counsel

William G. Me Crea, for plaintiff (respondent)., Charles W. Dayton, for defendant (appellant).

Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co.

Opinion of the Court

Dttgeo, J.

A careful examination of the papers fails to show any improper exercise of discretion by the court at Special Term. The original complaint sufficed for one kind of relief. The supplemental complaint is but for more extensive relief. Latham v. Richards, 15 Hun, 129.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

Sedgwick, Oh. J., and Gtldeksleeve, J., concur.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.