The Superior Court of New York City, 1893

Little v. Wirth

The Superior Court of New York City · Decided December 15, 1893

6 Misc. 301; 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 295

Counsel

Joseph H. Fargis, for plaintiff (appellant)., Welch & Daniels (George S. Daniels, of counsel), for defendant (respondent).

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment appealed from was entered in due conformity with the order sustaining the demurrer, and the notice of appeal does not ask for a review of the order. But independently of that the judgment is right upon the merits, *302and should be affirmed upon the opinion rendered by the learned judge below.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.