The Superior Court of New York City, 1893

Halsted v. Halsted

Halsted v. Halsted
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided May 1, 1893
52 N.Y. St. Rep. 450

Counsel

John M. Bowers, for app’lts; Lewinson & Falk, for resp’t.

Halsted v. Halsted

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam

There were certain characteristics of the application below which justify the decision that was made. It was .uncertain that the letters contained anything that would benefit the defendants if offered as evidence. Indeed, the contents are undisclosed. The application does not avow specifically that the contents, if learned, will be offered in testimony upon the trial.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

Sedgwick, Ch. J., and McAdam, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.