The Superior Court of New York City, 1894

Denslow v. Bush

Denslow v. Bush
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided June 15, 1894 · McAdam
60 N.Y. St. Rep. 608

Counsel

R. H. Griffin, for app’lt; Carter, Hughes & Kellogg, for resp’ts.

Denslow v. Bush

Opinion of the Court

McAdam, J.

The special term judge made an order sustaining the demurrer interposed to the complaint, with leave to the plaintiff to amend on payment of costs. No interlocutory or final judgment has been entered; the appeal is from the order only, and such an appeal will not lie. Cambridge Valley Nat. Bank v. Lynch, 76 N Y. 514; Whitman v. Nichols, 16 Abb. Pr., N. S., 329 ; Lacustrine Fert. Co. v. Lake, etc., Co., 16 Hun, 484; Garner v. Harmony Mills, 6 Abb. N. C. 212 ; 45 N. Y. Supr. Ct. R. 148; *609Bell v. Sun Co., 1 Mo. Law Bull. 29; Trust & Deposit Co. v. Pratt, 25 Hun, 23, and similar cases. For these reasons, the appeal must be dismissed with costs.

Freedman, P. J. concurs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.