The Superior Court of New York City, 1895

Norton v. Matthews

Norton v. Matthews
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided January 15, 1895
11 Misc. 711; 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 878

Counsel

It. P. Lee and G. A. Seixas, for appellants., Frederic R. Fellogg, for respondents.

Norton v. Matthews

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The appellants having failed to print the evidence given upon the trial by the parties, the findings of fact made by the learned trial judge must be deemed to have been made upon sufficient evidence. The only question raised by the appeal, therefore, is whether the conclusions of law are warranted by the facts as found. Upon a careful consideration of this question we think they are.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion filed below.

Present: Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.