The Superior Court of New York City, 1895

Pew v. McCaul

Pew v. McCaul
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided January 15, 1895 · Freedman
11 Misc. 711; 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 879

Counsel

A '. M. <& G. Gard, for appellants., Timothy J. Shea, guardian ad litem of infant defendants., Joseph N. Goldbacher, for respondent. .

Pew v. McCaul

Opinion of the Court

Freedman, J.

The judgment appealed from is for foreclosure and sale under a mechanic’s lien filed by plaintiff. *712. The substantial controversy between the parties vjas as to the amount due under the lien. Upon a full' review of the whole cáse, it appears that upon the- evidence the referee had sufficient, grounds for finding, and for refusing to find,, as he did; that the exceptions- taken by the defendants to the rulings of the referee upon questions of evidence are without merit, and that' no substantial reason- exists- which, calls for reversal..

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

McAdam and Gildersleeve, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.