The Superior Court of New York City, 1895

True v. Sibley

True v. Sibley
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided January 15, 1895 · Gildersleeve
11 Misc. 712; 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 882

Counsel

Yandevgpoel, Gumming c& Good/uivn,- (Delos MeGurdy, of counsel), for appellant., August Deymert, for -respondent.

True v. Sibley

Opinion of the Court

Gildersleeve, J.

The -questions of fact raised by' the pleadings and by the conflict of evidence in -this action were. properly submitted to the jury by the learned trial court, in a charge to which no’exception was taken.. The jury,, by their verdict, found in favor of the plaintiff in the sum -of $800. With their conclusion the General Term- will not. interfere;, as, iü our opinion, it. is. amply justified by the evidence before -us; There are no questions of law presented on this appeal which require discussion. • ■ '

The judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed, .with costs;.

Freedman, J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.