Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
The Superior Court of New York City, 1895

Mead v. New York Elevated Railroad

Mead v. New York Elevated Railroad
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided July 1, 1895
12 Misc. 646

Counsel

Eoarts, Ohoate c& Beaman (Joseph II. Ohoate, W. V. Howe and T. T. Sherman, of counsel), for respondent., Da/oies & Rapadlo (Julien T. Da/oies, Brai/na/rd Tolies and J. 0. Bushby, of counsel), for appellants. .

Mead v. New York Elevated Railroad

Opinion of the Court

Per Cu/riam.

The awards herein are supported by a fair preponderance of evidence. The learned trial judge seems to have followed correct principles of law in the trial and determination of the issues raised. We have examined the case with care, and find no substantial reason for disturbing the decision of the court below.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.