Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
The Superior Court of New York City, 1895

Gerstein v. Fisher

Gerstein v. Fisher
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided October 15, 1895
14 Misc. 644

Counsel

- Osea/r H. Bogart {Hiram \Ketehum, of counsel), for appellant.. ' ■, Louis Steekler, for respondent. :

Gerstein v. Fisher

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from should be affirmed on the opinion filed by the learned judge below. In view of the decisions in Collins v. Hydorn, 135 N. Y. 320, and Furlong v. Banta, 80 Hun, 248, the case of Anderson v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 9 Daly, 487, cannot be followed, and the decision of Featherson v. Newburgh & C. Turnpike Co., 24 N. Y. Supp. 603, has no application.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present: Freedmah and McAdam, JJ.

- Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.