Superior Court of Buffalo, 1893

Close v. Noye

Close v. Noye
Superior Court of Buffalo · Decided July 15, 1893 · White
4 Misc. 616; 26 N.Y.S. 93; 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 115

Counsel

Samuel Fleischmam, for plaintiff (respondent)., A. Moot, for defendant (appellant).

Close v. Noye

Opinion of the Court

White, J:

I am for an affirmance of the judgment appealed from solely on the authority of the case of Hawthorne v. Calef, 2 Wall. 10, which seems to hold that, notwithstanding the reservation by the legislature of the right to amend charters of corporations, the act of 1892 is unconstitutional as to the plaintiff in this action.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.