Superior Court of New York, 1885

White v. Benjamin

White v. Benjamin
Superior Court of New York · Decided December 18, 1885
36 N.Y.S. 1135 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Smith & Dougherty and L. S. Tenney, for appellants., Whitlock & Simonds (W. C. Beecher, of counsel), for respondents.

White v. Benjamin

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

To warrant a new trial in this case the practice requires not only that the newly-discovered evidence be material, and that it has been discovered since the trial, but that the evidence could not, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, have been sooner discovered; and that it is so decisive in character as to make it appear with reasonable certainty that on another trial it would change the result. The defendants did not present a case bringing them within the rule stated, and no error was committed by the court below in denying their motion. The order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.