Superior Court of New York, 1889

Scholle v. Scholle

Superior Court of New York · Decided January 14, 1889

4 N.Y.S. 809; 56 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 399; 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1725 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Alexander B. Johnson, for appellant. J. Bleeker Miller, for respondent Lyons. Thomas Hooker, for respondent Brown.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The orders are severally affirmed upon the opinion of J udge Ereedman delivered below. The receipts of Seholle brothers, admitting the title of Raynor to three undivided tenths, have great effect in determining that probably the parties to the deed of Raynor to Phillips did not intend that it should convey the three-tenths referred to, and that there was a clerical omission from the deed. Orders severally affirmed, with §10 costs in each, with the disbursements to be taxed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.