Superior Court of New York, 1891

Bailey v. Claflin

Bailey v. Claflin
Superior Court of New York · Decided January 5, 1891
13 N.Y.S. 230; 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1050 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

S. F. Kneeland, for appellant. Abram Kling, for respondent.

Bailey v. Claflin

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This case appears to have been tried on the same testimony upon which the case of Eckhardt v. Epstein, 11 N. Y. Supp. 585, was tried, *231and the report of the referee and the judgment entered thereon were substantially the same in both cases. That case was appealed to this court, and affirmed. As the same questions were presented in both eases, it follows that the j udgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs, on the opinion in Eckhardt v. Epstein, supra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.