Superior Court of New York, 1891

Faivre v. Union Dime Savings Institution

Superior Court of New York · Decided January 5, 1891

13 N.Y.S. 423; 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1151 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

5". A. Vien, for appellants. Arnoux, Ritch & Woodford, ( William, H. Ar~ noux, of counsel,) for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Quinn v. Bank for Savings (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York 1904)
McKeown v. Bank for Savings (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York 1899)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The orders, when modified as hereinafter directed, may tie sustained under the general banking act of the state of Hew York. Laws 1882, c. 409. (See chapter 10 of said act.) The provision directing the Union Dime Savings Institution to open a new account as a deposit to the credit of this action, under its usual by-laws and regulations, etc., should be stricken out, and in place thereof the said savings institution should be required to deposit the fund in court, according to the usual practice in such cases. As thus modified, the orders should be affirmed, without costs to either party on this appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.