Superior Court of New York, 1891

Duffy v. Work

Duffy v. Work
Superior Court of New York · Decided July 2, 1891 · Dugro
15 N.Y.S. 143; 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3089 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Redfield & Redfield, for appellant. A. L. Pincoffs, for respondents.

Duffy v. Work

Opinion of the Court

Dugro, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint entered upon the findings and decision of a judge at special term. At the trial both parties gave evidence. A careful examination of the papers presented fails to disclose any ground which calls for a reversal of the judgment. The burden of establishing his cause of action by a fair preponderance of evidence was not satisfactorily borne by the plaintiff at the trial. If the second conveyance is considered to have been given as security, and so a mortgage, it would not help the plaintiff’s case, as by his conduct he has es-topped himself from claiming that the sale to Sexton was a conversion; for he took service to find a purchaser, and when unsuccessful in his efforts accepted $1,000 to give possession to a purchaser. The judgment is affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.