Superior Court of New York, 1891

Bauer v. Consumers' Ice Co.

Bauer v. Consumers' Ice Co.
Superior Court of New York · Decided October 10, 1891 · Dugro
15 N.Y.S. 975; 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 271 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Edwards & Odell, (Hamilton Odell, of counsel,) for appellant. Lachman, Morgenthau & Goldsmith, (Samson Lachman, of counsel,) for respondent.

Bauer v. Consumers' Ice Co.

Opinion of the Court

Dugro, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor entered upon a verdict, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. A careful examination of the case discloses no error. The case required the submission of the evidence to the jury. The charge was fair, and presented the questions to be determined clearly and impartially. The requests to charge *976were sufficiently covered for the purposes of the case in the charge of the learned trial judge, and no injustice was done the defendant by the refusals to charge, except as had been charged. Upon the whole ease the judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.