Superior Court of New York, 1892

Menike v. Manhattan Railway Co.

Menike v. Manhattan Railway Co.
Superior Court of New York · Decided January 11, 1892 · Freedman
17 N.Y.S. 954; 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 621 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Davies & Rapallo,'(Julien T. Davies and Brainard Tolies, of counsel,) for appellant. George J. Greenfield, (W. Allaire iShortt, of counsel,) for respondent.

Menike v. Manhattan Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

Freedman, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff through the negligence of defendant’s servants in attempting to get on board of one of the trains of defendant’s railway. Upon the trial the defendant produced no evidence, and the case was submitted to the jury upon the testimony given by and on behalf of the plaintiff. Upon such testimony the case was clearly one for the jury. A dismissal of the complaint would have been error. All the questions as to which the trial judge was requested to charge were submitted to the jury under a charge which fully guarded every right the defendant had. The jury were expressly instructed that they might render a verdict for the defendant, although the testimony of the plaintiff was uncontradicted. Upon the whole case no exception appears of sufficient merit to call for reversal. The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.