Superior Court of New York, 1892

Frank v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.

Frank v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.
Superior Court of New York · Decided March 14, 1892 · Dugro
18 N.Y.S. 207 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Davies & Rapallo, for appellants. Saekett & Bennett, for respondents.

Frank v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.

Opinion of the Court

Dugro, J.

That there should be affirmance in these cases follows from Jordan v. Railway Co., 18 N. Y. Supp. 205, (decided at this term.) No errors requiring reversal appear in the admission of the evidence objected to in the Lubin and the Ludovici cases. Judgments affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.