Frank v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.
Frank v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.
18 N.Y.S. 207
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
That there should be affirmance in these cases follows from Jordan v. Railway Co., 18 N. Y. Supp. 205, (decided at this term.) No errors requiring reversal appear in the admission of the evidence objected to in the Lubin and the Ludovici cases. Judgments affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.