Barrett v. Smith
Barrett v. Smith
19 N.Y.S. 1020
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
It was not error to allow the plaintiff to show that the witness Vero had said at the time of his arrest: “Is this the 108th street racket?” for this evidence tended to show that Vero testified untruly when he, upon his direct examination, said: “Ho unusual accident was brought to my attention, except when I was arrested.” Upon the whole case the judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.