Superior Court of New York, 1892

Jacobs v. Morrison

Jacobs v. Morrison
Superior Court of New York · Decided July 5, 1892 · Freedman
19 N.Y.S. 1021 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Beeves <& Todd, for appellant. I. George Elammer, for respondent.

Jacobs v. Morrison

Opinion of the Court

Freedman, J.

The record submitted does not contain the evidence given upon the trial of the issues, and consequently it must be assumed that the findings of fact which were made were supported by sufficient evidence. That being so, the only substantial question presented by the appeal is whether the facts, as found, justify the conclusion of law based thereon, and the judgment as finally entered. Upon due examination I have satisfied myself that the conclusions of law are fully warranted by the facts as found, and that the judgment as entered is correct.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.