Superior Court of New York, 1893

Halsted v. Halsted

Halsted v. Halsted
Superior Court of New York · Decided May 1, 1893
23 N.Y.S. 191 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Platt & Bowers, (John M. Bowers, of counsel,) for appellants., Lewinson & Falk, for respondent.

Halsted v. Halsted

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

There were certain characteristics of the application below which justify the' decision that was made. It was uncertain that the letters "contained anything that would benefit the defendants, if offered as evidence. Indeed, the contents are undisclosed. The application does not avow specifically that the contents, if learned, will be offered in testimony upon the trial.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.