Superior Court of New York, 1895

Pew v. McCaul

Pew v. McCaul
Superior Court of New York · Decided January 7, 1895 · Freedman
31 N.Y.S. 1132 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

A. M. & G. Card, for appellants. Timothy J. Shed, guardian ad litem and attorney for infant defendants., Joseph N. Goldbacher, for respondent.

Pew v. McCaul

Opinion of the Court

FREEDMAN, J.

The judgment appealed from is for foreclosure and sale under a mechanic’s lien filed hy plaintiff. The substantial controversy between the parties was as to the amount due under the lien. Upon a full review of the whole case, it appears that, upon the evidence, the referee had sufficient grounds •for finding, and for refusing to find, as he did; that the exceptions taken by the defendants to the rulings of the referee upon questions of evidence are without merit, and that no substantial reason exists which calls for reversal. The judgment should be •affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.