Superior Court of New York, 1895

Sturges v. Newcombe

Sturges v. Newcombe
Superior Court of New York · Decided May 6, 1895
33 N.Y.S. 558; 12 Misc. 371 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Treadwell Cleveland, for appellants., Sturgis & Roby, for respondent.

Sturges v. Newcombe

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

It was not a valid objection to the order appealed from, made at special term, that it permitted an amendment that substituted a cause of action different from the one averred in the complaint. Deyo v. Morse, 144 N. Y. 216, 39 N. E. 81. The peculiarities of the litigation placed it within the discretion of the court to determine whether or not there were laches on the part of the plaintiff which should defeat his application to amend. Order affirmed, with $10 costs, and disbursements to be taxed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.