Castillo v. Central Park Tower Condominium
Opinion
Castillo v Central Park Tower Condominium 2024 NY Slip Op 34003(U) November 12, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 158801/2022 Judge: Judy H. Kim Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service.
This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.
INDEX NO. 158801/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 109 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/12/2024
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. JUDY H. KIM PART 04 Justice ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 158801/2022 ANGEL CASTILLO, MOTION DATE 09/06/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 002 -v- CENTRAL PARK TOWER CONDOMINIUM, BROADWAY 57TH/58TH RETAIL INVESTOR, LLC, NORDSTROM, INC., LENDLEASE (US) CONSTRUCTION INC., EXTELL DECISION + ORDER ON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY D/B/A BROADWAY TRIO LLC, EXTELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, BROADWAY TRIO MOTION LLC, Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
CENTRAL PARK TOWER CONDOMINIUM, EXTELL Third-Party DEVELOPMENT COMPANY D/B/A BROADWAY TRIO LLC, Index No. 595587/2023 EXTELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, BROADWAY TRIO LLC Third-Party Plaintiffs, -against- STRAUSS-CREATIVE FINISHES, INC. Third-Party Defendant. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------X The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 91, 92, 93, 94, 95 were read on this motion to CONSOLIDATE .
Upon the foregoing documents, plaintiff’s motion to consolidate is granted without opposition.
On October 14, 2022, plaintiff commenced this action alleging that on or about September 20, 2021, while acting within the scope of his employment at the construction site at 217 W. 57th Street, New York, NY, he was caused to fall and sustain serious and personal injuries due to the
158801/2022 CASTILLO, ANGEL vs. CENTRAL PARK TOWER CONDOMINIUM ET AL Page 1 of 5 Motion No. 002
Plaintiff’s motion is granted. “Consolidation is generally favored in the interest of judicial economy ... where cases present common questions of law and fact, unless the party opposing the motion demonstrates that a consolidation will prejudice a substantial right” (Raboy v McCrory Corp, 210 AD2d 145 [1st Dept 19941 quoting Amtorg Trading Corp v Broadway & 56th St Assoc, 191 AD2d 212, 213 [1st Dept 1993]) and it is undisputed that the Queens Action and the instant action arise from the same workplace accident and present common questions of law and fact.
Since this action was commenced prior to the Queens Action and the events at issue in both actions occurred in this county, New York County is the proper venue for the consolidated action (See Harrison v Harrison, 16 AD3d 206, 207 [1st Dept 2005] “[w]here two actions involving identical issues are pending in separate counties, the actions should be consolidated pursuant to CPLR § in the county where the first action was commenced absent special circumstances”).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion is granted and the action Angel Castillo v Smitell LLC, Smitell Retail LLC, Smitell Development Group LLC and Smitell Legacy LLC, pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County under index number 160124/2023, shall be consolidated within the present action; it is further ORDERED that the consolidation shall take place under Index Number 158801/2022 and the consolidated action shall bear the following caption:
158801/2022 CASTILLO, ANGEL vs. CENTRAL PARK TOWER CONDOMINIUM ET AL Page 2 of 5 Motion No. 002
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X ANGEL CASTILLO, Index No.: 158801/2022 Plaintiff, -against- CENTRAL PARK TOWER CONDOMINIUM, BROADWAY 57TH/58TH RETAIL INVESTOR, LLC, NORDSTROM, INC., LENDLEASE (US) CONSTRUCTION INC., EXTELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY D/B/A BROADWAY TRIO LLC, EXTELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, BROADWAY TRIO LLC, SMITELL LLC, SMITELL RETAIL LLC, SMITELL DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC and SMITELL LEGACY LLC, Defendants. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X CENTRAL PARK TOWER CONDOMINIUM, EXTELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY D/B/A BROADWAY TRIO Third-Party Index No. 595587/2023 LLC, EXTELL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and BROADWAY TRIO, LLC, Third-Party Plaintiff, -against- STRAUSS-CREATIVE FINISHES, INC., Third-Party Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X and it is further ORDERED that the pleadings in these actions are hereby consolidated and shall stand as the pleadings in the consolidated action; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County, shall transfer the documents on file in Angel Castillo v Smitell LLC, Smitell Retail LLC, Smitell Development Group LLC and Smitell Legacy LLC, Index No. 160124/2023, to the Clerk of this Court for the purpose of consolidation; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County and the Clerk of this Court shall coordinate the transfer of the documents being transferred so as to ensure an efficient
158801/2022 CASTILLO, ANGEL vs. CENTRAL PARK TOWER CONDOMINIUM ET AL Page 3 of 5 Motion No. 002
158801/2022 CASTILLO, ANGEL vs. CENTRAL PARK TOWER CONDOMINIUM ET AL Page 4 of 5 Motion No. 002
This constitutes the decision and order of the Court.
11/12/2024 DATE HON. JUDY H. KIM, J.S.C. CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED X NON-FINAL DISPOSITION X GRANTED DENIED GRANTED IN PART OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT REFERENCE
158801/2022 CASTILLO, ANGEL vs. CENTRAL PARK TOWER CONDOMINIUM ET AL Page 5 of 5 Motion No. 002
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.