New York Supreme Court, 1799

Cannon v. Cathcart

Cannon v. Cathcart
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1799
1 Cole. Cas. 80
Cannon v. Cathcart

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The difeharge ordered at laft January Term was conditional, and it was the duty of defendant to have paid the cofts to plaintiff, without waiting for a demand, or the tender of a bill. If he is relieved now, it muft be on payment in-*81Jlanter of the coils ordered laft January Term, and alfo the coils of the fubfequent proceedings, including the coils of refiíting this application.

Let him take the effe£l of his motion on thofc conditions. , f jgfr;basofc+i/s, ¿ off*" fi, '

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.