New York Supreme Court, 1799

Concklin v. Hart

Concklin v. Hart
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 15, 1799
1 Johns. Cas. 103
Concklin v. Hart

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

There appears to be a reasonable ground

for granting a commission in sucha case, and the application may be -made at any time after the commencement of the suit.(b)

Rule granted.

2 R. S. 392, § 2. Graham’s Pr. (2d ed.) 585. Mumford v. Church, infra, 147, 150, u. (a). See also, Anon. 6 Ves. Jr. 573, Sumn. ed. Rowe v__, 8 id. 262. Pritchard v. Gee, 5 Mad. 364. Pearson v. Ward, 2 Dick. 648. S. C. 1 Cox, 177. Shirley v. Earl Ferrers, 3 P. Wms. 77. Hanken v. Middleditch, 2 Brown, 640. Brydges v. Hatch, 1 Cox, 423. Botts v Verelst, 2 Dick. 454. Shelley v. 13 Ves. 57. Cholmondeley v. Oxford, 4 Bro. 156. Bellamy v. Jones, 8 Ves. 32. Fitzhugh v. Lee, Ambl. 65. See 19 Ves.. 321. Palmer v. Aylesbury, 15 Ves. 301. Sumn. ed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.