New York Supreme Court, 1799

Le Conte v. Pendleton

Le Conte v. Pendleton
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 15, 1799
1 Johns. Cas. 104

Counsel

Harison, in behalf of the plaintiff,, *Pendleton, contra,

Le Conte v. Pendleton

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Take your rule, that one only of the two pleas be allowed, and that the defendant, within four days after notice of the rule, elect, or in his default the plaintiff may elect, which of the two pleas shall stand, and that the other be struck out.(a)

In this case, the two pleas required different trials, the former by the record, and the latter by the county, and, therefore, could not be tried together. See Coleman’s Cases, 35, 73, but since the Revised Statutes, vol. 2, p. 409, § 4, the issue of nul tiel record must be tried by a jury. Trotter v. Mills, 6 Wend. 512; and see Weatherwax v. Averill, 6 Cowen, 589.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.