New York Supreme Court, 1799

Davis v. Ostrander

Davis v. Ostrander
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 15, 1799
1 Johns. Cas. 106
Davis v. Ostrander

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

It is not a bond for the payment of money, and not within the act of congress on this subject, and therefore need not be stamped.(a)

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Note. On the application of the clerk for the direction of the court on the question, whether powers of attorney in suits depending in this court, ought to be received without being stamped,

The Court said, that such powers need not be stamped, and that the above mentioned act applies to general letters of attorney only.

See Burns v. Baker, infra, 134. Conry v. Warren, infra, vol. 3, 259.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.