New York Supreme Court, 1799

Thayer v. Rogers

Thayer v. Rogers
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1799
1 Johns. Cas. 152

Counsel

Riggs, for the plaintiff,, Harison, for the defendant

Thayer v. Rogers

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Every matter of defence that can be admitted under the first plea, may be given in evidence under the second. The first is, therefore, useless, and is ordered to be. struck out. ' ■

Note. The defendant also pleaded four other pleas, some of which the plaintiff also moved to strike out;' but [*153] *the defence appearing to be complicated, and the propriety of the pleas demanding a close examination, the. court did riot think it a -case sufficiently clear to discriminate between them, and interfere in this, peremptory manner.(a)

Rule granted.

Gra. Frac. 2d edit. 244, 245.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.