New York Supreme Court, 1800

Sacket v. Lothrop

Sacket v. Lothrop
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 15, 1800
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 94; 1 Cole. Cas. 91

Counsel

Bogardus for the demandant,, S. Thompson, contra.

Sacket v. Lothrop

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The tenant, if he would put the demandant out of court, should have entered a ne recipiatur on the quarto die post; not having done so here, it must be considered a waiver. By the rule entered, that the sheriff return the writ sedetite curia, the demandant was to be deemed continued in court from, day to day during the term. Vide Boothe, 92.

So let the tenant be called.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.