New York Supreme Court, 1800

Post v. Van Dine

Post v. Van Dine
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 15, 1800
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 109

Counsel

Eacker, for the plaintiff., Walton, for the defendant.

Post v. Van Dine

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

At the last circuit, there was'no time to try a junior cause, so that no trial has in reality been lost. As the defendant has sworn to merits, and as money to the full amount, in lieu of bail, was tendered on the 11th of July, and refused, and as bail has since justified, this motion must be denied, but on payment of the costs of the rule to show cause and of the motion, by the sheriff.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.