Mc Evers v. Markler
Mc Evers v. Markler
1 Johns. Cas. 248
Opinion of the Court
Though the defendant was entitled to fourteen days notice of tñal, yet the notice that was given was sufficient to put him on inquiry, and he ought to have made his application at the last term. Having suffered a term to intervene since the verdict was taken, he comes too late with the present motion.
Rule refused.
а) Gra. Prac. 2d edit. 679, 680.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.