Sebring v. Rathbun
Opinion of the Court
The note being endorsed to the plaintiffs, after it was dishonored,' the defendant no doubt had a *right to make every defence against them which [*332] he might have setup against the payee ;
Rule refused.
Johnson v. Bloodgood, supra, 51, 54, n. (a)
The maxims In pari delicto, potior est conditio possidentis, and In azquali jure mclio'r est conditio possidentis, are fully considered in Bro. Max. 323-330.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.