New York Supreme Court, 1800

Post v. Van Dine

Post v. Van Dine
New York Supreme Court · Decided July 15, 1800
1 Johns. Cas. 412

Counsel

Eacker, for the plaintiff., Walton, for the defendant.

Post v. Van Dine

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

There was no time at the last circuit to . try a junior cause, so that,, in truth, no trial has been lost. The defendants having sworn to merits, and as he tendered, on the 11th of July, the full amount in money as security, which was refused, and as bail has since justified, we think the motion ought to be denied, but -on payment by the sheriff of the costs of the rule to show cause, and of this motion.(b).

Ride refused.

See Gra. Prac. 2d edit. 165-167.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.