Sealy v. Shattuck
Sealy v. Shattuck
2 Johns. Cas. 69
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff ought to have applied for the effect of his rule, at the next term, after notice of it was proved. Having slept so long, he must be presumed to have waived it. The motion must be denied.
Motion denied.(
(a) See n. b. to Sheldon v. McEvers, sup. vol. 1, p. 69. Oppie v. Colgrove, 19 Johns. R. 124. Burr v. Waterman, 18 id. 508. 2 Grah. Prac. 2d ed. 955.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.