New York Supreme Court, 1800

Campbell v. Grove

Campbell v. Grove
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1800
2 Johns. Cas. 105

Counsel

Emolt , Ten Broeck,

Campbell v. Grove

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The defendant must take nothing by his motion. The attorney had no other way of compelling the payment of his costs, than by the suit on the bail-bond. Besides, the defendant has suffered such a length of time to elapse, that we would not now relieve, if there had been originally just grounds for such interference.

Rule refused.(a)

(a) Grah.Prac. 2d ed. 678. Bergen et al. v. Boerum,2 Caines, 256. Clark v. Frost, 3 id. 125. Wilcox v. Howland, 6 Cowen. 576.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.